America is a young, boisterous country. We like different flavors of government. We find public squabbling amusing.
We are a one-party state (capitalist) and the capitalist party has two factions: Democrat and Republican. And the US Government is wary of power falling into the hands of anti-capitalists.
China is a one-party state also (communist) but factions are discouraged. China is a very old country, and they've had enough of factions. The Chinese government is wary of power falling into the hands of anti-Communists.
It is often assumed that Communism must be un-democratic because undemocratic forms of Communism are the only ones we've seen. Instead of leading people to the conclusion that cooperation works better than competition, early Communists assumed they had to enforce cooperation amongst "the masses".
Today, if you want to see what this looks like in real life, visit Singapore: a competent, honest national government providing for its citizens. Singapore pretends to permits factions to compete, but it really doesn't; the same party has been in power since Singapore was founded.
China has studied Singapore and other countries' governments closely, and is busy developing its own version. This post is a progress report on how things are faring thus far.
About twenty years ago China held its first public elections of small-town mayors (village heads). Until then, heads were appointed by the central government. The experiment was a success, and eventually the requirement that candidates be Communist Party members was dropped.
Chinese participation in elections is very high--higher than our own. And voters are cautiously optimistic that their ballots do make a difference.
The Chinese people also elect local Peoples Congress delegates (who can also come from any party, or no party at all). These elected Congressmen and Congresswomen then elect the most competent people from their ranks to the National Peoples Congress.
The National Peoples Congress functions like our Congress in some respects: it doesn't have as much direct power as our Congress, but it can make life hell for the Administration, delaying unpopular bills for years. There's plenty of politicking, but Chinese deliberations, squabbling, and elbowing are all done off-stage. When they get together in public, differences are put aside and the final form of the new legislation gets support--however half-hearted--from everyone.
Being Westerners, we see this as a sign that the Chinese Congress is merely a "rubber stamp", but their way of doing things is VERY Chinese. They abhor public squabbling amongst people in authority. With their 3000-year perspective, they see such behavior as sign of instability.
It is possible to have a successful career in senior Chinese government if you are not a member of the Communist Party. Some have (very bright people that any government would want to recruit) in reality it is difficult.
Imagine how hard it would be for a flaming Democrat, a union organizer, to advance in the United States Justice Department after 30 years of Republican administrations, and you get the picture. It's easier to switch than fight.
And last year local governments began to hold elections for government offices within the Party itself. The aim is to eventually have all 70 million Party members elect officials at all levels:
Shenzhen takes step toward intra-Party democracy
Shenzhen, a pioneer city in the country's reform and opening-up, has taken the lead again in the development of intra-Party democracy.
Qiu Zhankai from the city's municipal bureau of civil affairs has become the first directly elected secretary of the Party committee at a local government organization in China.
"We must reform the selection system to make it more democratic, open and competitive," said Li Yuanchao, head of the Central Organization Department.
Qiu was selected on May 15 after seven months of public recommendation, and the whittling down of 75 candidates to 26 finalists, who gave speeches and answered questions from the audience.

Qiu, the 55-year-old deputy director, beat his nearest competitor Zu Yuqin by a slight margin once votes were counted.
There's more....
And..
Neighborhood democracy hits close to home across Nanjing
And...
Reflecting on Western Democratization
Zhang Weiwei
There's more
Participatory democracy crucial
By Xiong Lei (China Daily)
In 2006, the 6th Plenary Session of the 16th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China summarized the participatory democracy into the following four rights: Right to know, right to participate, right to expression and right to monitor or supervise. These four rights can be regarded as the cornerstone of China's participatory democracy.
Of course, there have been obstacles in the course of people's enjoyment of these rights. There have been cases of abuses of power. But we have been moving to improve our system to honor these rights, and we also see encouraging signs that ordinary people and individuals are acting to practice these rights.
By all means, more and more people in China have come to realize the significance of participatory democracy. Extensive participatory democracy can benefit individuals and society at large better than free elections.
The author is a guest professor of journalism with the Beijing Foreign Studies University.
(China Daily 11/28/2009 page4)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave constructive comments about this post